LA TIMES ENTHUSIASTICALLY ENDORSES MEASURE J
The LA Times gave a 100+ percent endorsement of Measure J today, arguing that it is a win for transit, the economy, and for LA County. Entitled "Yes on Measure J," read the endorsement in its entirety below:Something extraordinary happened in Los Angeles County in 2008: At a time when the local and national economies were melting down, local voters opted, by a two-thirds margin, to raise their own taxes. Specifically, under Measure R they upped the county sales tax by half a cent on the dollar to pay for transportation improvements.
It was the right thing to do then, and passing a related proposal on the November ballot, Measure J, is the right thing to do now.
Measure J wouldn't increase anybody's taxes, but it would extend the tax approved under Measure R for another 30 years — from its current expiration date of 2039 to 2069. That would allow transit managers to borrow money on the bond market in the near future to be repaid from anticipated tax revenues that would roll in after 2039, which should allow them to accelerate construction on a list of up to 15 projects that were already in the works thanks to Measure R. What this means is that, ideally, the projects could be completed in a matter of years rather than decades. The projects slated for acceleration include an extension of the Gold Line light rail eastward, the Westside subway, an extension of the Green Line to L.A. International Airport, improvements to the 5 Freeway in northern L.A. County, ramp and interchange improvements on the 405, 110 and 91 freeways, and sound-wall construction countywide.It's not certain that all 15 projects would actually be sped up. Most depend on federal money in addition to local revenues, and the federal government won't necessarily cooperate. But if it doesn't, L.A. taxpayers haven't lost a dime — if the federal funds aren't forthcoming, the bonds won't be issued. In lieu of the bond market, meanwhile, transit planners could turn to the federal government for loans. A new U.S. Department of Transportation program allows municipalities to borrow money for transportation projects, which could be repaid with Measure J funds.
Wouldn't Measure J just stick future generations with the bill for this generation's infrastructure? Not really. Light-rail lines are expected to last at least 100 years; future generations will still be driving the highways and riding the rails being built now, and there's no reason they shouldn't be asked to pay their share of the cost. Moreover, borrowing and construction costs are unusually low at the moment, so it's probably cheaper to build now than later. Accelerating construction would boost jobs at a time when Los Angeles could badly use the economic stimulus. And although Measure J would tie up the tax money generated by Measure R for even longer than the original measure, that doesn't mean it will tie the hands of transit planners in the future — they can still build projects not on the Measure R list, using the proceeds of two previous sales tax initiatives, Measures A and C.
Isn't it a bit early to be extending the sales tax when it's not clear whether Measure R is a success? Actually, Measure R's success is already pretty clear; in three years, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority has completed an extension of the Orange Line dedicated busway to Chatsworth and started construction on two light-rail lines and three highway projects. Much more is on the way, regardless of whether Measure J passes.
Measure J's opponents bring up the same tired arguments that were used (often by the same people) to oppose Measure R; mostly, they're from parts of the county where people don't feel they have as much to gain as folks in downtown or the Westside. But that's not the case. Traffic burdens the whole county, and there's a good chance that people who live in areas without a lot of upcoming projects commute or sometimes travel to areas that do, and thus would benefit from faster travel times. Meanwhile, 15% of the money raised under Measure R (and J) goes to local communities — to every city in the county — to spend on improvements in their area.
The transit projects accelerated by Measure J would ease congestion, reduce pollution and increase quality of life, without raising taxes. If Angelenos of the future decide they don't want to continue paying the half-cent sales tax, they can vote to sunset it. But in November, Angelenos of the present should vote yes on Measure J.
COOL STORY FROM SOMEPLACE ELSE: NO MORE FREEWAYS IN MASSACHUSETTS
Massachusetts Transportation Secretary Richard Davey has launched a “mode shift” campaign: He says it’s time for people to get out of their cars and onto trains, buses, bikes, and their own two feet. He wants to triple the share of trips taken by those modes, instead of single-occupancy vehicles, by improving transit service and active transportation amenities like lighting, sidewalks, curb cuts and rail-trails. Moreover, he told a press conference, "We will build no more superhighways in this state. There is no room."
Read more on Streetsblog.
Read more on Streetsblog.
EL MONTE'S SUPER-SIZE NEW BUS STATION OPENS FOR BUSINESS
El Monte's new bus station opens Sunday and as far as bus stations go, it's the bomb — with 29 bus bays, a bike station, art and architecture, and access to both Metro's Silver Line and Foothill Transit's Silver Streak.Read more on The Source.
HAVE YOU SEEN THE YES ON MEASURE J CAMPAIGN WEBSITE YET?
Have you seen the Yes on Measure J campaign website yet? It's at www.measurej4jobs.org.
If voters approve Measure J they will be providing LA County with its own self-help job-creating economic stimulus package and addressing one of LA’s perpetual problems: traffic congestion.
Measure J would create 250,000 jobs over the next decade – at a time when unemployment in the county remains very high at 11 percent — by accelerating the construction of seven transit lines and up to eight highway improvement projects, all of which have already been approved by voters.
Find out how Measure J provides traffic relief and thousands of jobs, and why community leaders say you should vote Yes on Measure J!
www.measurej4jobs.org
If voters approve Measure J they will be providing LA County with its own self-help job-creating economic stimulus package and addressing one of LA’s perpetual problems: traffic congestion.
Measure J would create 250,000 jobs over the next decade – at a time when unemployment in the county remains very high at 11 percent — by accelerating the construction of seven transit lines and up to eight highway improvement projects, all of which have already been approved by voters.
Find out how Measure J provides traffic relief and thousands of jobs, and why community leaders say you should vote Yes on Measure J!
www.measurej4jobs.org
MEASURE R AND TIFIA CHANGING THE GAME FOR TRANSIT?
The Next American City blog tells the story of how LA Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Measure R are changing the game for transit, and quotes Move LA Executive Director Denny Zane extensively. Jake Blumgart writes:
Denny Zane, former mayor of Santa Monica and executive director of Move LA, a transit advocacy group, [says expansion of the TIFIA program was] a necessary step for cash-strapped local governments looking to make strategic long-term investments without breaking the bank. “You can borrow money for multiple projects and not just one project at a time,” Zane said. “Its like a line of credit and it means. . . communities can plan for their assistance knowing that they are virtually assured of getting a low interest loan for not just one, but a whole system of projects. As a result they actually plan a system instead of just one line.”
Zane argues that the TIFIA expansion can ease the political rivalries that often bedevil transit projects as multiple communities struggle over a particular line of funding. His evidence? It allowed L.A. to move forward with Measure R’s designated projects in 10 years, instead of 30. Zane believes the initial approval ratings for Measure R would have been even higher had voters known the projects could be completed in their lifetimes. The 400,000 jobs created by these large-scale transit projects are an added bonus. Good for employment and the environment, easing traffic and stimulating the local economy, and with what seems like an easily replicable model. What could be wrong with that?
Read the rest of Denny's comments here:
Denny Zane, former mayor of Santa Monica and executive director of Move LA, a transit advocacy group, [says expansion of the TIFIA program was] a necessary step for cash-strapped local governments looking to make strategic long-term investments without breaking the bank. “You can borrow money for multiple projects and not just one project at a time,” Zane said. “Its like a line of credit and it means. . . communities can plan for their assistance knowing that they are virtually assured of getting a low interest loan for not just one, but a whole system of projects. As a result they actually plan a system instead of just one line.”
Zane argues that the TIFIA expansion can ease the political rivalries that often bedevil transit projects as multiple communities struggle over a particular line of funding. His evidence? It allowed L.A. to move forward with Measure R’s designated projects in 10 years, instead of 30. Zane believes the initial approval ratings for Measure R would have been even higher had voters known the projects could be completed in their lifetimes. The 400,000 jobs created by these large-scale transit projects are an added bonus. Good for employment and the environment, easing traffic and stimulating the local economy, and with what seems like an easily replicable model. What could be wrong with that?
Read the rest of Denny's comments here:
LA DRIVERS KILL PEDESTRIANS & BICYCLISTS AT HIGHER THAN NATIONAL RATE
A new University of Michigan study that looked at traffic fatalities in New York City and Los Angeles, and compared them with rates nationwide, found that drivers in LA kill pedestrians and bicyclists at a significantly higher rate than nationally. Drivers in NYC kill even more, but the rates of walking and biking are also significantly higher.
The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute found that in Los Angeles pedestrians accounted for about a third of all traffic fatalities, nearly triple the national average of 11.4 percent. About 3 percent of the fatalities were bicyclists, compared to 1.7 percent nationally. In New York, 49.6 percent of traffic fatalities were pedestrians and 6.1 percent were bicyclists.
The study used data on 449,498 crashes within Los Angeles city limits during an eight year period from 2002 to 2009. During this time 2,086 of these crashes involved at least one death.
LA County Bicycle Coalition Planning and Policy Director Eric Bruins told the LA Times that while 20 percent of all trips in the county are on foot or by bike, less than 1 percent of county transportation funding goes to improvements for pedestrians and bicyclists.
Read more in the LA Times.
The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute found that in Los Angeles pedestrians accounted for about a third of all traffic fatalities, nearly triple the national average of 11.4 percent. About 3 percent of the fatalities were bicyclists, compared to 1.7 percent nationally. In New York, 49.6 percent of traffic fatalities were pedestrians and 6.1 percent were bicyclists.
The study used data on 449,498 crashes within Los Angeles city limits during an eight year period from 2002 to 2009. During this time 2,086 of these crashes involved at least one death.
LA County Bicycle Coalition Planning and Policy Director Eric Bruins told the LA Times that while 20 percent of all trips in the county are on foot or by bike, less than 1 percent of county transportation funding goes to improvements for pedestrians and bicyclists.
Read more in the LA Times.
LOS ANGELES BACK ON TRACK: THE VIDEO
Nice video about Los Angeles getting back on the right track with transportation. Watch it on The Source.
CALLING ALL STROLLERS FOR THE CICLAVIA PED PARADE DOWN FIGUEROA
We’re sure CicLAvia is in your calendars already (hint: it’s Sunday) but do you also know there will be a parade down Figueroa organized by LA Walks with the intent of giving walkers a leg-up, as it were, in an event that has been mostly about bicycling? LA Walks is “calling all strollers” to join the 3-mile parade at 11:30 a.m. at the northwest corner of 8th and Figueroa. This section of street was chosen in part because it is the future home of the South Figueroa Corridor Project, destined to become LA’s model transit/bike/ped corridor with separated bike lanes, pedestrian plazas, transit-only lanes – all on the same street!
Read more on Streetsblog.
Read more on Streetsblog.
THE CRENSHAW/LAX LINE IS IN THE MONEY!
The $545.9 million loan for the $1.75 billion Crenshaw/LAX Line is now a done deal, one beneficiary of the enhanced TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act) loan program approved by Congress this summer as part of the federal transportation reauthorization, MAP-21. The 8.5-mile light rail line and six stations will connect to the Green Line and the Expo Line.
Read the U.S. Department of Transportation press release here.
Read the U.S. Department of Transportation press release here.
FULTON ON SPRAWL: PUT THINGS FARTHER APART AND PROVIDING SERVICES COSTS MORE
Excellent op-ed in the LA Times today by former Ventura Mayor Bill Fulton, who says the bankruptcies in San Bernardino and Stockton are being blamed on pensions but this only masks a deeper problem — sprawl. The key paragraph is this: "Prosperity and solvency — or a lack thereof — are woven into the very fabric of our cities. Where houses go, where businesses go, where roads go, where sidewalks go, where farms and open space go are all things that collectively affect a community's economic performance and the cost of providing services there. Put things closer together and providing services costs less. Put things farther apart and providing services costs more — for the jurisdiction and its taxpayers. California cities haven't always planned and built in this fiscally responsible way, and that's one of the biggest reasons why cities are struggling financially today."
Read it here.
Read it here.
